Articles / crane

Kyrgyzstan runs two crane rulebooks — the Union’s machinery regulation and a national site law

Kyrgyzstan joined the Eurasian Economic Union on 12 August 2015, bringing TR CU 010/2011 into force there. A national law, No. 160 of 2 August 2016, makes a site with permanently installed lifting mechanisms a hazardous facility.

 

▌  INDUSTRY BRIEFING  ·  OCTOBER 2026  ·  KYRGYZSTAN

Kyrgyzstan runs two crane rulebooks — the Union’s machinery regulation and a national site law

Kyrgyzstan became the fifth member of the Eurasian Economic Union when its Treaty of Accession took effect on 12 August 2015. Membership was not only a tariff matter: it also brought the Union’s technical regulations into force on Kyrgyz territory, and the rule that governs lifting machinery is TR CU 010/2011, On safety of machinery and equipment. It was adopted by Decision No. 823 of the Customs Union Commission of 18 October 2011 and has applied since 15 February 2013. From that date a hoisting machine placed on the Union market has needed a Union conformity document and the EAC mark, replacing the older national certificate.

That is only the product half of the story. Kyrgyzstan also kept, and then rebuilt, a site-level law of its own. Law No. 160 of 2 August 2016, On industrial safety of hazardous production facilities, treats any site where permanently installed lifting mechanisms are used as a hazardous production facility. The two layers ask different questions. TR CU 010/2011 asks whether the machine may be placed on the market at all. Law No. 160 asks whether the installation, its operator and its records are safe to run.

 

▌  01  THE TWO DATES

▌  IN FORCE SINCE 15 FEBRUARY 2013  TR CU 010/2011 was approved by Decision No. 823 of the Customs Union Commission dated 18 October 2011 and came into effect on 15 February 2013. It moved from the Customs Union to the Eurasian Economic Union without being renumbered: the same decision, the same title, the same date. For lifting equipment it has been the base product rule of the region for more than a decade.

▌  EFFECTIVE FROM 12 AUGUST 2015  The Treaty on the Accession of the Kyrgyz Republic to the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union of 29 May 2014 was signed in Moscow on 23 December 2014 and entered into force on 12 August 2015. The underlying Union treaty had been signed in Astana on 29 May 2014 and entered into force on 1 January 2015, so the union existed before its fifth member joined it. Two dates therefore matter to a supplier: 2013 for the machinery rule itself, and 2015 for the day that rule reached Kyrgyzstan.

▌  02  THE ACCESSION WAS STAGED, NOT INSTANT

▌  PROTOCOL SIGNED 8 MAY 2015  Accession was not a single switch. On 8 May 2015 the Protocols to the Treaty on Accession were signed in Moscow at the level of the heads of state. The most relevant is the Protocol on the Conditions and Transitional Provisions for the Application by the Kyrgyz Republic of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union of 29 May 2014. It set out which Union rules Kyrgyzstan would apply at once and which it would phase in.

▌  DECISION NO. 11 OF 26 JANUARY 2016  The staging was then made concrete by the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission. Decision No. 11 of 26 January 2016, On the order of implementation of the technical regulations of the Customs Union in the Kyrgyz Republic, fixed a transition period for each regulation. A transition period is not a suspension: it is a window in which a national certificate could still be accepted alongside the Union document. The last of the windows ran into 2019. By now the schedule is spent, and the Customs Union technical regulations, TR CU 010/2011 among them, are the operative product rules in Kyrgyzstan.

▌  03  WHAT TR CU 010/2011 DOES TO A CRANE

▌  IT REGULATES THE MACHINE, NOT THE SITE  TR CU 010/2011 is a product regulation. It fixes minimum safety requirements for machines and equipment at design, manufacture, installation, commissioning, operation, storage, transport and disposal. It does not tell a site how to plan a lift, and it does not replace industrial-safety supervision. What it decides is whether a crane may cross the border and be sold at all.

▌  ARTICLE 1(5) REACHES HAZARDOUS FACILITIES  Article 1(5) applies the regulation to machines and equipment used at hazardous production facilities. A crane on a hazardous installation is therefore not outside the machinery regulation, let alone exempt from it. This is the hook that ties the Union product rule to Kyrgyzstan’s national site law, and it is why the two layers are read together.

▌  ARTICLE 1(4) CARVES OUT THE NEIGHBOURS  Article 1(4) lists what the regulation does not cover: wheeled vehicles, railway equipment, attractions, weapons and military equipment, agricultural and forestry tractors with their trailers, and drilling platforms. Each exclusion carries the same qualifier, that machinery installed on those excluded items stays in scope. A lorry crane is the classic case: the chassis is assessed under the wheeled-vehicle regulation, TR CU 018/2011, while the lifting equipment mounted on it is assessed under TR CU 010/2011.

▌  ANNEX 3 PUTS HOISTING MACHINES ON THE CERTIFICATION LIST  TR CU 010/2011 splits machinery two ways in Annex 3: objects that must be certified by an accredited body, and objects that may be declared by the applicant. Hoisting machines and lifting equipment, including cranes, sit on the certification side of that line. A declaration on its own is not enough for the base crane. Certification follows testing and, for serial production, an assessment of the manufacturer’s production conditions as well as the technical file.

▌  THE APPLICANT MUST SIT INSIDE THE UNION  Certification is applied for by a party established in the Union: the manufacturer, or a person performing the functions of a foreign manufacturer, meaning an authorised representative appointed in a member state. A certificate for serial production can run for up to five years, and once it is held the product carries the EAC mark. A European CE mark or a supplier declaration does not stand in its place. Used machinery, together with spare parts intended solely for the repair of already-certified machines, sits outside the mandatory assessment.

▌  04  THE NATIONAL LAYER: LAW NO. 160

▌  ADOPTED 2 AUGUST 2016  Kyrgyzstan’s own statute is Law No. 160 of 2 August 2016, On industrial safety of hazardous production facilities. It was passed by the Jogorku Kenesh on 29 June 2016 and has been amended since, most recently by Law No. 2 of 10 January 2023. It now governs how a hazardous facility is identified, registered, inspected and operated.

▌  ARTICLE 5(1)(3): A CRANE CAN MAKE A SITE HAZARDOUS  Article 5(1) lists the facilities that are hazardous by definition. Item 3 covers sites where permanently installed lifting mechanisms, escalators, cableways, funiculars and industrial lifts are used. The operative words are permanently installed. A tower crane or an overhead travelling crane fixed to a runway brings the site within item 3. A mobile crane that arrives, lifts and leaves does not. Article 5(3) places the duty of identification on the organisation operating the facility, and Article 5(4) leaves the risk-ranking criteria and the state-register procedure to the Cabinet of Ministers.

▌  ARTICLE 10 SETS THE OPERATOR’S DUTIES  Article 10 is the operative list, and it is long. An organisation running such a facility must comply with industrial-safety requirements; hold the licences the licensing system requires; admit only personnel who meet the qualification requirements, have no medical contraindication and have been trained and attested; submit the data needed to register the facility in the state register; arrange the coordination of work plans, diagnostics, testing and examination of structures and technical devices, including devices that have exhausted their technical resource; keep control instruments and systems working; conclude a liability-insurance contract; organise production control; plan for accidents; contract a professional rescue service; and hold financial and material reserves. The personnel and examination clauses matter most to a lifting-equipment buyer: together they turn a machine’s service history into a legal requirement.

▌  ARTICLE 2(10) AND ARTICLE 7 DEFINE THE EXPERTISE  Article 2(10) defines industrial-safety expertise as the determination that an object meets the industrial-safety requirements placed on it. Article 7 lists the activities inside the field: the design, construction, operation, reconstruction, overhaul, technical re-equipment, conservation and liquidation of a hazardous facility; the manufacture, installation, commissioning, servicing and repair of the technical devices used on it; the conduct of the expertise itself; and the training and retraining of the facility’s workers. Expertise is therefore a defined step in a documented chain, not a general opinion.

▌  05  WHO ACTUALLY INSPECTS

▌  СЭТН, UNDER THE MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES  State supervision sits with the Service of Ecological and Technical Supervision, the Служба экологического и технического надзора, abbreviated СЭТН in the official language and ЭТКК in the state language. It is a subordinate unit of the Ministry of Natural Resources, Ecology and Technical Supervision of the Kyrgyz Republic, at 720055, Bishkek, ulitsa Gorkogo 142.

▌  ITS PUBLISHED REMIT NAMES LIFTING MECHANISMS  The service’s published functions name lifting equipment directly. They cover supervision of safety requirements in the manufacture, construction, diagnostics, reconstruction, installation, commissioning, repair and operation of pressure vessels and steam and hot-water boilers, gas-supply plant, permanently installed lifting mechanisms, industrial lifts other than small goods lifts, attractions, escalators, funiculars and suspended passenger and freight cableways. The same unit carries industrial safety and mining supervision at the construction, expansion, reconstruction, technical re-equipment, operation, conservation and liquidation of hazardous production facilities.

▌  THE TWO LAYERS MEET AT THE SAME SITE  For a supplier the practical point is this. The EAC certificate answers the customs and market question. СЭТН answers the question the site will be asked once the machine is standing. The two are checked by different people, at different times: one before the machine ships, the other when it is installed and running. Budgeting for one and forgetting the other is the most common way a compliant crane still ends up idle.

▌  06  WHAT IT MEANS WHEN YOU SPECIFY OR BUY

●  Is the conformity route certification rather than declaration? For a crane under TR CU 010/2011 it is certification, and a declaration on its own will not clear the product.

●  Who is the applicant? The certificate must be applied for by a party established in the Union, either the manufacturer or an appointed authorised representative, and that party has to exist before the shipment.

●  What will the site need? If the crane is permanently installed it makes the site a hazardous production facility, with registration in the state register and the Article 10 duties attached.

●  Whose names are on the personnel file? Operators, riggers and maintenance staff have to be qualified, medically cleared and attested in industrial safety, not merely experienced.

●  Where is the examination evidence? Diagnostics, testing and examination of the device, including any device that has run out its technical resource, must be arranged to the timetable the Cabinet sets.

●  Is the machine simply used equipment? Used machinery and spare parts for the repair of already-certified machines sit outside mandatory conformity assessment, a route worth pricing against the new-machine path.

▌  07  WHAT TO WATCH

●  The harmonised product rule is settled, but the site-level rules are national and move by Cabinet decision. The state-register procedure is worth watching more closely than the technical regulation.

●  The certification-versus-declaration line inside Annex 3 is where mistakes are made. An applicant who files a declaration for a machine that needs certification gets a document that will not survive a check.

●  Crane type matters. The chassis and the lifting equipment on a lorry crane are assessed under two different regulations, and both files have to be complete before the unit is offered for sale.

●  The personnel and examination duties are continuing obligations, not one-off approvals. A missing attestation or an overdue examination is a live compliance gap on an operating site.

●  Kyrgyzstan is the newest Union member and its transition windows are spent. Documents that leaned on a national certificate during the phase-in period no longer have a transitional route.

This briefing summarises the Kyrgyz and Eurasian rules that apply to lifting equipment. It is not legal advice, and local rules still govern your site.

 

ABOUT

Shandong Zhinuo (ZNAQ) designs and manufactures tower crane safety monitoring systems and lifting-safety hardware for export markets, including load-moment limiting, zone-control and anti-collision functions. We read the Eurasian regime as a two-layer model, a certified machine on a registered site, and we prepare the documentation and data-logging evidence that a TR CU 010/2011 certificate and a hazardous-facility examination both call for.

▌  CONTACT  shandongzhinuo@outlook.com  +86 176 6371 0314 · en.znaqkj.com

SOURCES

Eurasian Economic Commission, accession of the Kyrgyz Republic to the EAEU (treaty signed 23 December 2014; in force 12 August 2015) — eec.eaeunion.org

Eurasian Economic Commission, reference information on the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union (signed 29 May 2014; in force 1 January 2015) — eec.eaeunion.org

Eurasian Economic Commission, TR CU 010/2011 approved by Decision No. 823 of the Customs Union Commission of 18 October 2011, effective 15 February 2013 — eec.eaeunion.org

UNECE, ECE/CTCS/2018/8, Follow-up on ECE studies: Kyrgyzstan (EEC Board Decision No. 11 of 26 January 2016) — unece.org

USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, GAIN Report RS1623 (EEC Collegium Decision No. 11 of 26 January 2016) — fas.usda.gov

Law of the Kyrgyz Republic No. 160 of 2 August 2016, On industrial safety of hazardous production facilities, as amended 10 January 2023 — cbd.minjust.gov.kg

Service of Ecological and Technical Supervision (СЭТН), Ministry of Natural Resources, Ecology and Technical Supervision of the Kyrgyz Republic — ecoinspector.mnr.gov.kg

United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 3164, Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union: accession by Kyrgyzstan, effect 12 August 2015 — treaties.un.org